The Seattle Mariners' offseason strayed into whirlwind territory during the second day of the GM Meetings on Tuesday. A J.P. Crawford reunion was still on the board until it wasn't. Seiya Suzuki was an apparent long shot… and now he's not.
The Mariners, according to Adam Jude and Ryan Divish of The Seattle Times, have interest in the 32-year-old right fielder. He spent the first five seasons of his major league career with the Chicago Cubs, the last four of which were impressively consistent at the plate. He went 4-for-4 in topping a 125 OPS+ and 20 home runs annually.
It was only on Monday that Jude tossed cold water on the notion of a Suzuki-Mariners pairing, writing that it seemed "unlikely" that it would happen. For all the reasons Suzuki makes sense for the Mariners, his age and his likely $100 million price tag over at least four years stand in conflict with John Stanton's public aversion to committing big bucks to 30-somethings instead of 20-somethings.
"And bluntly, I’d much rather do that than sign a 30-year-old or 31-year-old star player who had been a star in their 20s to play through their 30s and maybe through 40 years old," Stanton said in September. "I think you’re far better off with players earlier in their career in the long term, and they happen to be less expensive because of the way the economics of baseball work."
Seiya Suzuki is a terrific fit for the Mariners on paper, and comes with advantages over Randy Arozarena
The argument in favor of Suzuki-to-Seattle is obviously centered on the promise of his bat, which largely passes the smell test posed by his results. His contact quality did take a dip this year, but the trade-offs for that included fewer strikeouts, more walks and a still-solid Pull Air% of 20.9. The other major point in his favor is that he made huge (and seemingly sustainable) strides with his defense, going from -4 Defensive Runs Saved in 2025 to +14 this year.
Defensive quality is at least one thing that Suzuki has on Randy Arozarena, and you can make the case that the latter also has a more volatile offensive outlook going forward. The Mariners also have some sneaky draft incentive to choose Suzuki over Arozarena. Assuming both reject their qualifying offers, the Mariners would give up their third-highest selection in 2027 by signing Suzuki, but would gain a selection after the first round if Arozarena signs elsewhere for over $50 million.
Besides, this probably isn't an either/or decision for the Mariners. Even if they wanted to retain Arozarena, it's long been an open secret that his preference is to return to the East Coast.
How much should anyone believe that John Stanton will break his spending rule for Seiya Suzuki?
No matter which way you slice it, this whole thing still comes back to the Stanton question.
Whether you agree with his stance on 30-something players, he's at least been consistent in sticking to his guns. The Mariners have largely avoided free agency in the decade that Stanton and Dipoto have been running the joint, making only two exceptions for splurges: Robbie Ray for five years, $115 million in 2021 and Josh Naylor for five years, $92.5 million last year.
Ray was coming off his age-29 season. Naylor was coming off his age-28 season. Suzuki, by contrast, is fresh off his age-31 season.
Still, perhaps it doesn't hurt that the Mariners have some history with Suzuki. They tried to sign him when he came over from Japan after the 2021 season, even getting Ichiro Suzuki involved in the sales pitch. Even if that didn't work, the "five years in the making" headlines will write themselves if the Mariners are able to get him this time.
And then, there's the simpler explanation for the interest in Suzuki: The time is now to get bold. It doesn't really square with what Stanton said in September or with Dipoto's infamously worded sustainability philosophy. But if Stanton is tired of waiting for a World Series and Dipoto feels like he needs bold action to pad his job security, well, who could blame them?
Per MLB Trade Rumors, Suzuki's projected contract is $105 million over four years. It's a lot by Mariners standards, and it's only fair to wonder if Suzuki's reps could push for more if the Mariners really want him. A T-Mobile Park tax, as it were.
As such, this signing is still something to be believed only when it is seen. That the Mariners are at least mulling it, though, is a genuinely pleasant surprise.
