<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SoDo Mojo &#187; Seattle Mariners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sodomojo.com/tag/seattle-mariners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sodomojo.com</link>
	<description>A Seattle Mariners Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mariners hit new low, must bounce back</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/19/mariners-hit-new-low-must-bounce-back/</link>
		<comments>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/19/mariners-hit-new-low-must-bounce-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[felix hernandez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Mariners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=10588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 24, the Mariners lost 10-3 in Houston to fall to 8-15 on the young season. This was the low point for the 2013 season, and the team knew they had to respond to have any chance of contending. They responded in earnest, winning five of six series to get to 20-21 on May [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 24, the Mariners lost 10-3 in Houston to fall to 8-15 on the young season. This was the low point for the 2013 season, and the team knew they had to respond to have any chance of contending. They responded in earnest, winning five of six series to get to 20-21 on May 16. They had a chance to surpass the .500 mark and make a run at Texas with a good series in Cleveland.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that dream scenario for the Mariners simply did not play out. They lost a nail biter in extra innings Friday, as an exhausted bullpen yielded a walk off homer to Jason Kipnis. They lost in similar fashion Saturday, on a walk off infield hit after they had stormed back with homers in innings eight and nine. When an up-and-coming team like the Mariners loses two games in devastating fashion, they need their best players to come through and dig them out of the hole.</p>
<p>Felix Hernandez was in perfect position to do just that Sunday morning, as he took the mound against Justin Masterson. Instead, Felix put together his worst start of 2013 and Masterson dominated, sinking the Mariners even deeper in a 6-0 loss.</p>
<div id="attachment_10591" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/65/files/2013/05/7358862.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-10591" title="MLB: Seattle Mariners at Cleveland Indians" src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/65/files/2013/05/7358862-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A pair of bummed out Mariners. David Richard-USA TODAY Sports</p></div>
<p>Hernandez lasted just five innings and surrendered six runs (five earned) on eight hits. He walked two and struck out eight. The big blow came off the bat of Michael Brantley, who ripped a three-run homer to centerfield in the second inning to put Cleveland up 5-0.</p>
<p>The Mariners didn&#8217;t do anything to help themselves offensively either, as Masterson dominated for seven incredible innings. He allowed just three hits, walking two and striking out 11. At times, the Mariners had absolutely no idea against Masterson. The loss dropped the M&#8217;s to 20-24, and Cleveland can finish the sweep tomorrow.</p>
<p>All that equates to gut check time for Seattle. They need to win tomorrow with Hisashi Iwakuma on the mound to salvage something from this series and prepare for two games against the Angels in LA. They cannot get discouraged by watching Felix get shelled today. That happens to Felix from time to time as it does to all pitchers. Felix especially struggles at Progressive Field, where he is 3-5 lifetime with a 4.50 ERA in nine starts. He had a similarly horrendous start right around this time last season (on May 16, 2012, Felix gave up eight runs on ten hits in just 3.2 innings at Progressive Field). This bad start and loss doesn&#8217;t mean much in the grand scheme of things.</p>
<p>But it could if the Mariners let it get them down. If they refuse to plod forward like good teams do and dwell on these three consecutive losses, they may never scrape .500 again in 2013. Iwakuma can win tomorrow, and the ship will be right back on track for the best Mariners team in a few long years.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/19/mariners-hit-new-low-must-bounce-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Raul Anomaly</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/18/the-raul-anomaly/</link>
		<comments>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/18/the-raul-anomaly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JJ Keller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mariners General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raul Ibanez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Mariners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=10585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people know that I am one of Raul Ibanez&#8216;s biggest critics. Being of the sabermetric-mold, I do not place very much value in a 40 year old DH-in-the-outfield, who can only hit in Yankee Stadium. I don&#8217;t know why, but that just isn&#8217;t appealing to me. More traditional fans do not necessarily focus on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people know that I am one of <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/i/ibanera01.shtml?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-sodomojo.com">Raul  Ibanez</a></strong>&#8216;s biggest critics. Being of the sabermetric-mold, I do not place very much value in a 40 year old DH-in-the-outfield, who can only hit in Yankee Stadium. I don&#8217;t know why, but that just isn&#8217;t appealing to me. More traditional fans do not necessarily focus on that though, and will point to his veteran leadership. And that is just fine. Raul seems like a great guy, and might be able to mentor some of the kids. But there are problems with that too.</p>
<p>In reality, there is not much he can do. Sure, he can tell people to keep their head up or whatever, but it comes down to the players ability. Encouragement is great, but it doesn&#8217;t really matter if the recipient just can&#8217;t hit. Raul follow me around day and night, giving me words of wisdom and encouragement. Doesn&#8217;t replace the fact that I am an out of shape, slightly lazy 17 year old, who stopped playing select baseball at 14 because I just was not that great anymore. If I would have worked my butt off like my friends who kept playing, then maybe it would be different. But it still comes down to what I can do, not what someone is telling me I can do.</p>
<p>So those are the basic reasons why I disagreed with the Raul signing, especially for $2.75M. That and the fact that I knew he was still going to get a lot of playing time despite being a veteran presence. My reasoning for that belief? See <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/o/olivomi01.shtml?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-sodomojo.com">Miguel  Olivo</a></strong> over <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/j/jasojo01.shtml?utm_campaign=Linker&#038;utm_source=direct&#038;utm_medium=linker-sodomojo.com">John  Jaso</a></strong> last year.</p>
<p>But, over the last week or so, things have changed a bit. Raul is no longer hitting below the interstate (that&#8217;s .190 for those who do not get the reference), and in fact, is crushing the ball. After today&#8217;s tough loss in Cleveland, he has 6 homers in 7 games. And dating back to May 4th against Toronto he has slashed a ridiculous .375/.394/1.031. This streak has led many to start talking about how good Raul really is, in addition to his veteran presence.</p>
<p>While it is nice to see him hit like this, it is not going to continue. I am sorry, but it just won&#8217;t. He now has a .839 OPS on the season, which is 328 points higher than the .511 he had before the streak. There are a few different reasons why there is no way he sustains the .839:</p>
<ol>
<li>6 of the his last 8 games, when the success started, have been on the road. Raul thrives in hitter-friendly parks. Yankee Stadium is a prime example. He had a .343 wOBA there last year, compared to .223 on the road. And that pattern continued this year, and 4 of his hits and 3 of his home runs came in New York. He won&#8217;t have the luxury of playing in that little league field they call a big league stadium anymore.</li>
<li>.562 points of his .839 OPS have come from his slugging percentage. Hitting 6 home runs in a week will do that for you. Raul does not have that kind of power anymore, or ever really. That would be the highest SLG% of his career, and he obviously won&#8217;t sustain it. Plus, it is hard to have any long term success with a OBP under .300.</li>
<li>Raul just is not that good, plain and simple. He used to be, but at his age, he is not the same. He will probably have another one of these stints where he crushes the ball. That is what hitters like him do. But I would not think they will last much longer than this one has.</li>
</ol>
<p>There is also another big point that I think needs to be made, despite it&#8217;s &#8220;elementary&#8221; feel. Defense is still a part of the game. I know it sounds simple, but people ignore it. Everyone sees the dingers and forgets that Raul is the most gif-able player in the league. Before today&#8217;s game (because it isn&#8217;t updated as fast) Raul&#8217;s WAR was a -0.1. He was costing the team 1/10th of a win with his play. That will probably go up a tad, maybe to an even 0, or a positive decimal. So despite this show he has put on at the plate, his overall value is extremely low. He can&#8217;t field, he can&#8217;t run, and he can only kind of hit sometimes.</p>
<p>Hot streaks are fun. It is good to see a fan favorite like Raul kill the ball, especially against a team like the Yankees. But do not take this for more than it is. An anomaly. A rather exciting one, but an anomaly nonetheless. Don&#8217;t get me wrong either. I like Raul and respect the player he was for the Mariners. But the key word is <em>was</em>. He is not that same player, and if I had it my way, he probably wouldn&#8217;t be on the team.</p>
<p>I know a lot of what I said will seem pretty obvious to most of you. But there are a lot of people who overreact to things like this, and do not understand how things like this work. In fact, I would say most traditional-thinking fans would fall into this category, so I still think this was a point that needed to be made. You probably won&#8217;t see USS Mariner or Lookout Landing making this sort of post, but they do not appeal to the casual fan as much as we do at Sodo Mojo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/18/the-raul-anomaly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How not to make a quality start starring Joe Saunders</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/18/how-not-to-make-a-quality-start-starring-joe-saunders/</link>
		<comments>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/18/how-not-to-make-a-quality-start-starring-joe-saunders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe saunders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Mariners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=10582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the fifth time in 2013, Joe Saunders failed to record a quality start on the road, as the Mariners lost 5-4 to the Indians in Cleveland Saturday. Saunders went 5.1 innings, allowing four earned runs on 11 base hits while walking and striking out two. All things considered, it was probably Saunders&#8217; best road start of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the fifth time in 2013, Joe Saunders failed to record a quality start on the road, as the Mariners lost 5-4<strong> </strong>to the Indians in Cleveland Saturday. Saunders went 5.1 innings, allowing four earned runs on 11 base hits while walking and striking out two. All things considered, it was probably Saunders&#8217; best road start of the season. Still, he laid out a blueprint of how not to make a quality start with a few key things he did or did not do.</p>
<div id="attachment_10583" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/65/files/2013/05/7294116.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-10583" title="MLB: Seattle Mariners at Texas Rangers" src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/65/files/2013/05/7294116-300x212.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="212" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Joe Saunders&#8217; road struggles continued Saturday. Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports</p></div>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t mess around with two outs</strong></p>
<p>Too often during Saturday&#8217;s start, Saunders failed to close the book on the Indians after recording two outs. As a matter of fact, Ryan Divish pointed out on Twitter that Saunders has zero 1-2-3 innings in road starts this season. This inability not only costs the Mariners precious runs but also runs Saunders&#8217; pitch count way up. Today proved no exception.</p>
<p>In the first inning, Saunders quickly retired Michael Bourn and Jason Kipnis with just eight pitches. When Asdrubal Cabrera stepped in, Saunders gave up a base hit on his fourth pitch of the at-bat. This small crack in the armor proved lethal for Saunders, who threw seven balls to the next two hitters, Nick Swisher and Mark Reynolds, walking Swisher and giving up an RBI single to Reynolds. All told, he threw 17 pitches with two outs in the first inning.</p>
<p>The second inning almost mirrored the first one, except that Saunders survived unscathed. He only needed seven pitches to retire Mike Aviles and Jan Gomes, but ran into trouble with Drew Stubbs and Bourn. Saunders walked Stubbs and Bourn singled. Kipnis ended the threat with a come-backer to the mound, but Saunders&#8217; pitch count took another huge two-out hit. He threw 16 more pitches with two outs, running his count to 48 through two innings.</p>
<p>Saunders only threw two two-out pitches in the third, stranding a runner at second and throwing only 18 pitches. He threw ten pitches with two outs in the fourth, allowing a single to Bourn before retiring Kipnis. However, he ran into two-out trouble again in the fifth. Swisher basically hit a home run to left field, except that the wind knocked it down and Raul Ibanez made the catch. Cabrera, at first after a lead off single, was totally fooled and the Mariners doubled him off. Yet Saunders apparently learned nothing from Swisher, as he left another pitch out over the plate to Reynolds, who hit it in almost the same spot as Swisher, except this one carried out for a solo home run.</p>
<p>To notch a quality start on the road, Saunders cannot afford to mess around with two outs like he did today.</p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t sacrifice an early edge in the count</strong></p>
<p>Saunders threw a ton of first pitch strikes today, especially early on. Of the 29 batters he faced, Saunders threw them 20 first pitch strikes. That doesn&#8217;t even include at bats where Indians&#8217; batters put the ball in play on the first pitch. Saunders took control of most of the hitters he faced right from the get go, which should foreseeably help him.</p>
<p>However, of those 20 first pitch strikes that didn&#8217;t end up in play, Saunders followed 13 of them up with second pitch balls. Saunders would frequently get ahead and immediately surrender his advantage with the next pitch. He needed to stay aggressive and make things happen to keep his pitch count down. Instead, he ended up with 120 pitches in a weak 5.1 inning start.</p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t heavily rely on balls in play</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>In five road starts this year, Joe Saunders pitched 24 innings. He struck out seven batters in those appearances. Seven! In 24 innings! Sure, Saunders isn&#8217;t a strikeout pitcher, but that&#8217;s just horrendous. His inability to get batters out on his own hurts him significantly, as it did today. Saunders allowed 11 hits and recorded 14 outs on balls in play. That&#8217;s a horrendous BABIP against, but when you only strike out two batters of 29, that kind of stuff happens. Quality starts are built on commanding the strike zone and batters, and Saunders did neither with effectiveness in the loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sodomojo.com/2013/05/18/how-not-to-make-a-quality-start-starring-joe-saunders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 29/43 queries in 0.144 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 479/564 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: sodomojo.com @ 2013-05-20 00:07:31 by W3 Total Cache -->