<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Mariners Should Not Sign Jarrod Washburn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/</link>
	<description>A Seattle Mariners Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Exploring Every Free Agent Rumor I Can Think of &#124; SoDo Mojo &#124; A Seattle Mariners Blog</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Exploring Every Free Agent Rumor I Can Think of &#124; SoDo Mojo &#124; A Seattle Mariners Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-667</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarrod Washburn: See Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarrod Washburn: See Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eastcoastmariner</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>eastcoastmariner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Couldnt agree more with you guys. I think Nolasco is clearly a solid #2 and would represent a significant upgrade to the M&#039;s rotation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldnt agree more with you guys. I think Nolasco is clearly a solid #2 and would represent a significant upgrade to the M&#8217;s rotation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Jason Churchill is a great analyist, but there are always disagreements about player potential. There has been other past situations where I disagree with his assesment. I think I tend to side with Griffin on this one. He may not be an &quot;Ace&quot; but he has some electric stuff. I don&#039;t think him filling a #2 slot is out of the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Churchill is a great analyist, but there are always disagreements about player potential. There has been other past situations where I disagree with his assesment. I think I tend to side with Griffin on this one. He may not be an &#8220;Ace&#8221; but he has some electric stuff. I don&#8217;t think him filling a #2 slot is out of the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffin Cooper</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffin Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Nolasco posted #2 type numbers in each of the last 2 seasons, and he&#039;d certainly be our best option for the #2 spot if we signed him. I&#039;m not sure how Jason figures that, I&#039;ve gotta disagree with him there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nolasco posted #2 type numbers in each of the last 2 seasons, and he&#8217;d certainly be our best option for the #2 spot if we signed him. I&#8217;m not sure how Jason figures that, I&#8217;ve gotta disagree with him there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I brought up the Nolasco idea on PI and JAC was not a big fan, citing him as a &quot;No. 3 guy at best&quot;

I disagree but take what you want out of that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I brought up the Nolasco idea on PI and JAC was not a big fan, citing him as a &#8220;No. 3 guy at best&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree but take what you want out of that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-586</guid>
		<description>he&#039;s showing some signs of improving albeit they are small... 

from what i hear he is being more agressive at the plate and that was something they wanted to see more out of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#8217;s showing some signs of improving albeit they are small&#8230; </p>
<p>from what i hear he is being more agressive at the plate and that was something they wanted to see more out of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-585</guid>
		<description>What do you guys think of Saunders&#039; play thus far over on the cardenales</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you guys think of Saunders&#8217; play thus far over on the cardenales</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Either way, I don&#039;t want Doug Davis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way, I don&#8217;t want Doug Davis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffin Cooper</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffin Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Andy, you cite plenty of bad stats in all of your articles. Also, Greg Johns is dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, you cite plenty of bad stats in all of your articles. Also, Greg Johns is dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/11/10/why-the-mariners-should-not-sign-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=1108#comment-582</guid>
		<description>I would give more credibility to tRA, with the qualification that batted ball types (which are included in tRA) aren&#039;t classified perfectly with the current systems. Still, it&#039;s important to have some idea of what type of contact a pitcher allows, and tRA does that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would give more credibility to tRA, with the qualification that batted ball types (which are included in tRA) aren&#8217;t classified perfectly with the current systems. Still, it&#8217;s important to have some idea of what type of contact a pitcher allows, and tRA does that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
