<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Jarrod Washburn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sodomojo.com/2009/07/27/more-on-jarrod-washburn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/07/27/more-on-jarrod-washburn/</link>
	<description>A Seattle Mariners Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Griffin Cooper</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/07/27/more-on-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffin Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=224#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Well said Scott, agree completely. Even if trading him does hurt the chances of us re-signing him in the off season, I&#039;d still prefer a guaranteed year of Hardy than a slightly higher chance at 1-2 years of Washburn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Scott, agree completely. Even if trading him does hurt the chances of us re-signing him in the off season, I&#8217;d still prefer a guaranteed year of Hardy than a slightly higher chance at 1-2 years of Washburn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Whale</title>
		<link>http://sodomojo.com/2009/07/27/more-on-jarrod-washburn/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Whale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sodomojo.com/?p=224#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Good article and agree totally. Better to have a sure thing next year than a strong possibility. Plus I don&#039;t think that we could make up the ground required to make a run at the playoffs with the Angels playing the way they are so we&#039;re better to be sellers and go for it again next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article and agree totally. Better to have a sure thing next year than a strong possibility. Plus I don&#8217;t think that we could make up the ground required to make a run at the playoffs with the Angels playing the way they are so we&#8217;re better to be sellers and go for it again next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
